However, playing it at lower resolutions (1440p in particular) has shown enough of an improvement that I'm comfortable with playing it at that resolution without it freaking the hell out.Īs for the questions, I'll answer them individually. It plays at just below 30 FPS now, but not really what I would call comfortable. It's an improvement now that it restarted. I'll do a quick update in the form of me saying this: running this at 4K is.well.rough. Because if BioShock can run and Civ V can run, I fail to see how anything Source can tank this badly. If anyone has a way of unborking the Source engine so that I can play stuff in 4K, that would be grand. I even reduced the resolution to 720p, one ninth of a 4K monitor, and the results did not improve much at all. Once the menu had loaded up, I loaded up the FPS counter. I ran Half-Life 2, and the first thing I noticed was how slow the splash screens were. Here's where things get interesting, however. I'll sort that out later.īioShock ran smooth as butter as well at 4K.Ĭivilization V wasn't particularly smooth, but the game's nature made it still playable for me at about 20 to 30 FPS. System Shock 2 crashed on launch, but whatever. Half-Life works perfectly fine, I hit the 100FPS cap without any issues whatsoever. I ran five games to see what worked and what didn't: Half-Life, System Shock 2, Half-Life 2, BioShock, and Civilization V. If you want to know my specification, my signature has you covered. So of course I went to try and play about with some games to see what would work with my configuration and what wouldn't. Yesterday I took delivery of an Acer K242HQK 4K monitor. Now, this is really confusing the hell out of me.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |